RE: FW: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t

 
>> But if it does, then keep the name simple, don't overload the 
>> name, the identifier, with a description of the semantics
>> 
>MMm... if we look at for example DateAndTime TC, does that not give
>similar semantics in the name? I am sure there are many others
>that do so too. 

I'd agree with Bert here: what's the point of having a name if it does
not convey semantics. Might as well call it "fred" or
"1.3.6.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.999" if not.

Andrew Smith