RE: FW: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vl anid-tc-mib-00.tx t

Inline

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Petch [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: vrijdag 2 januari 2004 12:32
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Bridge-Mib (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment:
> draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
> 
> No thoughts on whether the TC should exist or no.
> 
> But if it does, then keep the name simple, don't overload the 
> name, the identifier, with a description of the semantics
> 
MMm... if we look at for example DateAndTime TC, does that not give
similar semantics in the name? I am sure there are many others
that do so too. 

> ie VlanIdentifier VlanIds VlanId2 .. good
> VlanIdOrNone VlanIdOrNoneOrAny VlanIdAssociation   .. bad
> 
Bert
> Tom Petch