RE: FW: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t

Yes, the TC is useful. Concerning names, I do not know what VlanIdReference is supposed to mean, but at least it is not confusing like VlanIdAssociation. VlanIdOrNoneOrAny would be better. 

Regards,

Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 01 January, 2004 1:17 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Bridge-Mib (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: 
> draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
> 
> 
> OK, but do you think that the TC specified (none, a specific 
> one, or any)
> is a usefull one to have? ANd if yes, would then VlanIdReference be
> a proper name? Or do you have better names suggestions in that case.
> Would VlanIdOrNoneOrAny be better?
> 
> Thanks,
> Bert 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: donderdag 1 januari 2004 9:54
> > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Bridge-Mib (E-mail)
> > Subject: RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment:
> > draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
> > 
> > 
> > VlanIdAssociation is definitely a bad name - there are other 
> > 'VLAN associations' it may be confused with. 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Dan
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected] 
> > > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> > > Sent: 31 December, 2003 6:52 PM
> > > To: Bridge-Mib (E-mail)
> > > Subject: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: 
> > > draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Any comments?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bert 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mark Ellison [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: woensdag 31 december 2003 20:04
> > > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: Please review and comment:
> > > draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi Bert,
> > > 
> > > Thanks for your reply. 
> > > 
> > > I think I'd call a TC with a value range of Integer32 { 0 | 
> > 1..4094 | 
> > > 4095 }  a VlanIdReference or VlanIdAssociation.
> > > 
> > > This TC would be useful when defining an object that refers 
> > > to a vlan.  
> > > For example, a table where each entry can be associated with 
> > > none, one, 
> > > or any vlan.  One alternative, with the existing TCs, would 
> > be to use 
> > > VlanIdOrAny, but have the agent return noSuchInstance when 
> > > there is no 
> > > association with a vlan. Another alternative, with the 
> > existing TCs, 
> > > would be to use VlanIdOrNone, and not have use of the special 
> > > any/4095 
> > > value.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Mark
> > > 
> > > Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> > > 
> > > >Sorry for late reaction... but I am now again looking at 
> > > >this document and the discussion that we had back in October.
> > > >
> > > >inline
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > >>-----Original Message-----
> > > >>From: Mark Ellison [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > >>Sent: donderdag 2 oktober 2003 20:12
> > > >>To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> > > >>Cc: Mark Ellison; [email protected]
> > > >>Subject: Re: Please review and comment:
> > > >>draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.txt
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>Hi Bert,
> > > >>
> > > >>I'm wondering if there could be any mib or pib definition 
> > > requiring a 
> > > >>range of ( 0 | 1..4094 | 4095 )  for possible values?
> > > >>
> > > >>    
> > > >>
> > > >Mark, I have not seen anyone react to this as a option that they
> > > >wanted, so for now I am not going to include it.
> > > >It can of course always be added later if a need arises.
> > > >
> > > >By the way, what woyuld you call/name that TC?
> > > >
> > > >Bert
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > >>Regards,
> > > >>
> > > >>Mark
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>    
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bridge-mib mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib
> > > 
> > 
>