RE: FW: bridgemib wg

> > Since the doc is already at DS, let us go for the deploymemt report
> > and if we can show (via MIB walks) at the same time that it has
> > been implemented by multiple vendors, then I am willing to defend
> > that it can move to STD
> 
> If the walks stay anonymous, I can provide you walks from several 
> production systems. If the walks have to go public as well, then 
> I have to check with some owners whether they are fine with this.
> 
I think we can deal with the anonymous. In the sense that we need
a statement from someone that he/she tried (at least 2) different
vendors. You can mark them as vendor 1, 2, 3, 4, .., n
and then what I think I want is to report that Juergen Schonewalder
verified that 4 different vendors (known to Juergen) do support
the MIB as shows by the walks for vendors 1, 2,...
I.e. I do not think we need to publish the vendor names to a
public web site or mailing list.

Would that work.

Bert
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
> <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 
> 28725 Bremen, Germany
>