Re: FW: bridgemib wg

On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 11:51:02PM +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

> I think we can deal with the anonymous. In the sense that we need
> a statement from someone that he/she tried (at least 2) different
> vendors. You can mark them as vendor 1, 2, 3, 4, .., n
> and then what I think I want is to report that Juergen Schonewalder
> verified that 4 different vendors (known to Juergen) do support
> the MIB as shows by the walks for vendors 1, 2,...
> I.e. I do not think we need to publish the vendor names to a
> public web site or mailing list.

Ehm, I do not care about the vendor names. I care about the data
contained in the MIB walks since I will take them from production
(deployed) systems.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany