Re: Consensus Call

Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:43:52 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.bridge
Message-ID <20041105204352.GB2995@james>
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 05:25:02PM -0500, David B Harrington wrote:
 
> My goal, to make it clear, is to get the documents finished. I don't
> want to have to re-edit the documents to remove the PathCost32 because
> that will take another four to six months to a year at the glacial
> rate of this working group. I would like to simply last call the three
> documents as they currently stand and be done. 

Any editing regarding the PathCost32 issue should be rather easy once 
we have formed an opinion. I now hold the editing token and I am fine
to update the document on Friday or Saturday after the IETF if there
is a final decision reached next week. From my point of view, all
possible solutions (removing or keeping or changing) have more or 
less the same editing costs.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany