Re: Consensus Call
Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:43:52 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bridge |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20041105204352.GB2995@james> |
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 05:25:02PM -0500, David B Harrington wrote: > My goal, to make it clear, is to get the documents finished. I don't > want to have to re-edit the documents to remove the PathCost32 because > that will take another four to six months to a year at the glacial > rate of this working group. I would like to simply last call the three > documents as they currently stand and be done. Any editing regarding the PathCost32 issue should be rather easy once we have formed an opinion. I now hold the editing token and I am fine to update the document on Friday or Saturday after the IETF if there is a final decision reached next week. From my point of view, all possible solutions (removing or keeping or changing) have more or less the same editing costs. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany