RE: Consensus Call

Note that the RSTP-MIB has dependencies on PathCost32. This makes
editing just a touch more difficultt, but not seriously so.

dbh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 3:44 PM
> To: David B Harrington
> Cc: 'Tom Petch'; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Bridge-mib] Consensus Call
> 
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 05:25:02PM -0500, David B Harrington wrote:
>  
> > My goal, to make it clear, is to get the documents 
> finished. I don't 
> > want to have to re-edit the documents to remove the 
> PathCost32 because 
> > that will take another four to six months to a year at the glacial

> > rate of this working group. I would like to simply last 
> call the three 
> > documents as they currently stand and be done.
> 
> Any editing regarding the PathCost32 issue should be rather 
> easy once we have formed an opinion. I now hold the editing 
> token and I am fine to update the document on Friday or 
> Saturday after the IETF if there is a final decision reached 
> next week. From my point of view, all possible solutions 
> (removing or keeping or changing) have more or less the same 
> editing costs.
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
> <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 
> 28725 Bremen, Germany
>