Re: CAP-12 - interm version 'A'
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OFD193C81D.D7F1128F-ON85256D98.0064A69D-85256D98.006649BC@notesdev.ibm.com> |
Doug noted on 09/04/2003 03:54:14 PM:
> No, the instructions say:
>
> Use single spaced text within a paragraph, and one blank line
> between paragraphs.
>
> I have been told that also means you can not have two spaces after a
> period using the new interpretations.
Then how come not all text was changed like this?
I think you misundertood the text above from RFC 2223. I think they are
talking about not using LWSP to format text inside of paragraphs, not
actually formatting them using normal English punctionation and spacing
rules. After all, _that_ RFC uses 2 spaces after a period...
Also, I just checked the currenty RFC guidelines doc at
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt and it has no such text. This
is the direct link off the RFC Editors site and its dated 5-Sep-2002 (well
after RFC 2223, Oct 1997). I found the boilerplate and it clearly shows 2
spaces so unless they forgot to update the guidelines the RFC Editors site
(a possibility) then you got incorrect instructions. Heres the current
boilerplate I found:
The following verbatim statement must follow the optional opening
sentence:
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as
Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-
Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as
"work in progress."
I also looked at "Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors" (
draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-06.txt, Obsoletes RFC 2223,
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc-editor/instructions2authors.txt )
and it definitely contradicts the sentence you cited:
(7) Spaces at the End of a Sentence
When a sentence ended by a period is immediately followed by
another sentence, there should be two blank spaces after the
period. This rule provides clarity when an RFC is displayed
or printed with a fixed-width font.
So Im guessing you just misunderstood the intent of that single line in
RFC 2223. Can we get a 12-b with the normal 2 spaces back (so there will
be far fewer LWSP diffs!)??
Bruce
===========================================================================
Bruce Kahn INet:
[email protected]
Messaging & Collaboration Phone: 978.399.6496
IBM Software Group FAX: and nothing but the FAX...
Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...