Re: CAP-12 - interm version 'A'

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Message-ID <OFD193C81D.D7F1128F-ON85256D98.0064A69D-85256D98.006649BC@notesdev.ibm.com>
Doug noted on 09/04/2003 03:54:14 PM:
> No, the instructions say:
> 
>        Use single spaced text within a paragraph, and one blank line
>        between paragraphs.
> 
> I have been told that also means you can not have two spaces after a
> period using the new interpretations.

Then how come not all text was changed like this? 

I think you misundertood the text above from RFC 2223.  I think they are 
talking about not using LWSP to format text inside of paragraphs, not 
actually formatting them using normal English punctionation and spacing 
rules.  After all, _that_ RFC uses 2 spaces after a period...

Also, I just checked the currenty RFC guidelines doc at 
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt and it has no such text.  This 
is the direct link off the RFC Editors site and its dated 5-Sep-2002 (well 
after RFC 2223, Oct 1997).  I found the boilerplate and it clearly shows 2 
spaces so unless they forgot to update the guidelines the RFC Editors site 
(a possibility) then you got incorrect instructions.  Heres the current 
boilerplate I found:

The following verbatim statement must follow the optional opening
sentence:

     Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
     Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
     other groups may also distribute working documents as
     Internet-Drafts.

     Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
     months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
     documents at any time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-
     Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as
     "work in progress."

I also looked at "Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors" (
draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-06.txt, Obsoletes RFC 2223, 
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc-editor/instructions2authors.txt ) 
and it definitely contradicts the sentence you cited:

       (7) Spaces at the End of a Sentence

           When a sentence ended by a period is immediately followed by
           another sentence, there should be two blank spaces after the
           period.  This rule provides clarity when an RFC is displayed
           or printed with a fixed-width font.

So Im guessing you just misunderstood the intent of that single line in 
RFC 2223.  Can we get a 12-b with the normal 2 spaces back (so there will 
be far fewer LWSP diffs!)??

Bruce
===========================================================================
Bruce Kahn                                INet: 
[email protected]
Messaging & Collaboration                 Phone: 978.399.6496
IBM Software Group                         FAX: and nothing but the FAX...
Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.