Re: [Fwd: Re: CAP-12-a: Stored queries still?]
George Babics <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Doug Royer wrote: > > ... > >> The intent of stored queries was to make it easier for 'thin' clients >> to keep smaller footprints by allowing them to not have to (re)craft >> commonly used queries again and again; they relied on the CS to keep >> the query and involk it when the CUA needed it. This is a great >> concept but we failed to design our query language to allow for it to >> be _actually_ useful. > > > You keep (re)stating the obvious - however I find the queries useful > as did CS&T. So did John. > ... Oracle (formerly Steltor, which used to be CS&T) does not find them useful. I had a quick look at the archives and I believe that John also did not think that they were needed. George