Re: [Fwd: CAP-12 - interm version 'A']
Mark Smith <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > > > (142) were footer changed and would have changed > > anyway because the date of the draft changed. > > That Bruce finds it necessary to comment about on this list. > > > > (147) were because the expire date changed on header > > and elsewhere and would have changed anyway. > > That Bruce finds it necessary to comment about on this list. > > Since you had time to go thru the diff output at least to do some math > on the changes, why is that so hard for Doug to do it? Why is is so hard for you to admit that your posts of late have no technical content or CAP protocol issues in them. > Oh by the way, would you mind posting citations of the 18 actual > changes to the group for the benefit of those who dont have the cycles > to find them? I did not make some management report to publish. I simply looked at the file and had a note book next to me. Something I think Doug has been saying you should do for yourself.