Re: Recurrence ID recommendation - almost there
"Michael Fair" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Just wondering what the status on those lists are? I'm anxious to find out what the list of outstanding CAP issues are as well as getting the recurrence-id issued settled. -- Michael -- <[email protected]> wrote in message news:OFB1DAC4B7.C5FCB740-ON85256D9A.00620BD5-85256D9A.0062B3C4@egenconsulting.com... > I promised the list that I would post my findings and recommendation on > the Recurrence ID issue. I wanted to let the list know that I have not > forgotten this promise. I have indeed been working on just exactly that. > However, I have added to my chores production of a list of CAP issues. > Since I have been wading through 18 months of emails I discovered I may > have the ability to put down a short, succinct list of issues. Also, I'm > hoping to be able to "glean" consensus on some of them and violent > non-consensus on many others. If I am doing this legwork, it will be of > value to the list as well. > > In addition, I am making sure, with the original authors, that what I am > proposing is valid and will work. There is no sense mucking up a list > that is already overburdened with far too many nonproductive notes. Even > this one qualifies as nonproductive because it does not have my answer. > But that is coming. And not in a month - but, I'm hoping, by the end of > this week. I hesitate to put a date if I can't make it - but I am going > to try. The diff issue that was raised by Bruce sort of put me back a bit > - but it was worthwhile and necessary to work on that issue too. And, > sigh, being a small business owner, I had to go work on paying my > mortgage. I hate it when that happens. Not apologizing - just giving you > all a reality check on my part. >