Re: CAP-12-e: Alarms and SEQUENCE
Mark Smith <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > Since Doug is reluctant to provide a reference that he appears to have found Ill ask again: > Why do you continue to blame others? Why do you not ask the chairs? Do they not track consensus? I for one do not want sequence to change. It seems obvious that it is used to uniquely track valarms in components. Even your own original post quoted that. And you posted no solution to the problems that your own email said sequence solved. I say please do not change it, cap (other than some typos that I found and rewording that others have requested) is technically ready.