Re: CAP-12-e: Alarms and SEQUENCE
Doug Royer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://INET-Consulting.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > > <WARNING: This posting contains several historical references up front > so may be a bit long before returning to the technical bits> > > Doug replied on 10/20/2003 07:13:30 PM: > > Please read the archives (which you participated in), in summary: > > Ok, that confirms that I did ask about it before. Guess I never got > an answer that made sense to me... Searching for VALARM and SEQUENCE > yeilds many matches so can you please reference the date of discussion > or the subject of the thread where we actually resolved this? > The archive is several megabytes in size. No I will not be posting it so that every thing is in context. That is why there is an archive on line. Yes you do seem to understand why removing SEQUENCE breaks MODIFY of VALARMS. So I too do not want to break MODIFY of VALARMS. -- Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com -------------------------------|----------------------------- [email protected] | Office: (208)612-INET http://Royer.com/People/Doug | Fax: (866)594-8574 | Cell: (208)520-4044 We Do Standards - You Need Standards
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.6 KB) - not displayed