Re: CAP-12-e: Alarms and SEQUENCE

Doug Royer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Organization http://INET-Consulting.com
Message-ID <[email protected]>

[email protected] wrote:

>
> <WARNING: This posting contains several historical references up front 
> so may be a bit long before returning to the technical bits>
>
> Doug replied on 10/20/2003 07:13:30 PM:
> > Please read the archives (which you participated in), in summary:
>
> Ok, that confirms that I did ask about it before.  Guess I never got 
> an answer that made sense to me...  Searching for VALARM and SEQUENCE 
> yeilds many matches so can you please reference the date of discussion 
> or the subject of the thread where we actually resolved this?  
>          

The archive is several megabytes in size. No I will not be posting it so 
that every thing
is in context. That is why there is an archive on line.

Yes you do seem to understand why removing SEQUENCE breaks MODIFY
of VALARMS. So I too do not want to break MODIFY of VALARMS.

-- 

 Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com 
 -------------------------------|-----------------------------
 [email protected]                 | Office: (208)612-INET
 http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                                |   Cell: (208)520-4044

                We Do Standards - You Need Standards
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.6 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.