Re: When to publish -12 - VFREEBUSY

Craig Johnson wrote:

> Bruce Wrote on 10/31/03 13:19:
> > Craig wrote on 10/02/2003 07:35:54 AM:
> > > The example uses the SEARCH command with a VFREEBUSY to make
> > > the request. The advantages/benefits are:
> > > * It creates consistency and continuity between the WG standards for
> > > making a free-busy requests.
> >
> > Umm, I have to disagree with a couple of your points here.  iTIP 
> currently defines how to do
> > busytime lookups and > thats with METHOD:REQUEST (iTIP, Section 
> 3.3.2 REQUEST). 
> > As such, CAP is not consistant nor continuous from the existing 
> standards since its using
> > CMD:SEARCH and no METHOD property.
>  
> Respectfully, that misses the KEY point ... but gives me an 
> opportunity to restate it: 
> !!! The WG standard for making a request for free-busy time is with 
> the VFREEBUSY object. !!! 
> RFC 2445, p. 58:

It does and in -exactlyt- the same way - by the CUA and we added by the CS.

>  

-- 

Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
[email protected]                 | Office: (208)520-4044
http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                               |   Cell: (208)520-4044

               We Do Standards - You Need Standards