Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Doug Royer <[email protected]> Wed, 02 Jun 2004 23:00:28 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > > > (d) Selects every property and every component > that is in any "VEVENT" component, with each "VEVENT" > component wrapped in a BEGIN/END VALARM tags. Fixed to say VEVENT tags. > > which is later described as: > > (e) Selects all properties and all contained > components in all "VEVENT" components that have a "VALARM" > component with a "TRIGGER" property value between > the provided dates and times, with each "VEVENT" > component wrapped in a BEGIN/END VALARM tags. Fixed to say VEVENT tags. I left that in because in the past that was a question. Should the properties be in the VREPLY, or inside of a VEVENT? Inside the VREPLY would make it difficult to parse separate vevent objects. > > Bruce > PS: Why is the spacing skewed? Isn't it supposed to be all left edge > aligned when indented like that?? Bug in XML->RFC. Those kinds of fixes will have to be hand edited in the final approved push to the IETF. -- Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com -------------------------------|----------------------------- [email protected] | Office: (208)520-4044 http://Royer.com/People/Doug | Fax: (866)594-8574 | Cell: (208)520-4044 We Do Standards - You Need Standards
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.6 KB) - not displayed