Re: xCal - time to submit?

Speaking as calsify chair, I'd simply like to point out that this would 
in any case be strictly an individual effort; XML representation of 
iCalendar is firmly out of the scope of the calsify WG.

Cheers,
Aki

ext Doug Royer wrote:
> 
> 
> xCal has been around for quite a while. I have included
> the last comments (and they were great feedback).
> 
> Is it time to move xCal from draft to RFC status?
> This is the 2nd round of xCal. The first was was delayed so
> this version re-started at -00 as the other draft-many
> had expired.
> 
> Please let me know if you have any more issues:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-royer-calsch-xcal-02.txt
> 
> If not, lets move this to RFC proposed standard.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-calsify mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify