Re: Document editors

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:56:22PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Martin" == Martin Rex <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>     Martin> Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>     >>  I thing it would be important to have the WG members and
>     >> editors who have dealt with multiple GSSAPI
>     >> implementations. The extensions need to address the needs of
>     >> more then just Kerberos.
> 
>     Martin> violent agreement.
> 
> From me too.
> 
> I'd also like to see people there with experience with multi-mechanism
> implementations.

Martin Rex keeps pointing out his, but Sun has one also you know.

The Solaris libgss is truly multi-mechanism.  Moreover, Solaris also has
more than one mechanism.

> O, another proposed charter item is fixing SPNEGO if that doesn't get
> done sooner.  As you will recall the SPNEGO specification cannot be
> implemented because it does not describe the encoding of the mechanism
> oid sets to be included in the MIC.  IN addition there is significant
> desire to document implementation errors Microsoft made.

Further, we need a strategy for moving from broken SPNEGO to correct
SPNEGO.

Nico
-- 
-++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==
This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list
server.  If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the
message body of "unsubscribe ietf-cat-wg" to [email protected]