RE: Is CDI dead?
"Abbie Barbir" <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Mar 2003 17:24:54 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.cdi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2ED9D.33699FA6 Content-Type: text/plain Hi, I am talking to IESG on the known req draft. i will update later. abbie > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Day [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 4:32 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Is CDI dead? > > > We do still have a couple of drafts (scenarios and > known-mechanisms) that could conceivably make it to RFC. But > other than that, I would say that the group is pretty inert > and that the people who responded to my last query > overwhelmingly said that the WG should be wound down. > > --Mark > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf > > Of Michael Speer > > > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:14 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Is CDI dead? > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > Is CDI dead? No activity and no interest leads me to believe the > > > group is dead. Mark do you have any comments? > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2ED9D.33699FA6 Content-Type: text/html <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2656.31"> <TITLE>RE: Is CDI dead?</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <BR> <P><FONT SIZE=2>Hi,</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=2>I am talking to IESG on the known req draft.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>i will update later.</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=2>abbie</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=2>> -----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> From: Mark Day [<A HREF="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]</A>] </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 4:32 PM</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Subject: RE: Is CDI dead?</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> We do still have a couple of drafts (scenarios and </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> known-mechanisms) that could conceivably make it to RFC. But </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> other than that, I would say that the group is pretty inert </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> and that the people who responded to my last query </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> overwhelmingly said that the WG should be wound down.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> --Mark</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > -----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > From: [email protected] </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> [<A HREF="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]</A>]On Behalf </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > Of Michael Speer</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:14 PM</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > To: [email protected]</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > Subject: Is CDI dead?</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > > All,</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > > Is CDI dead? No activity and no interest leads me to believe the </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > > group is dead. Mark do you have any comments?</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > > Michael</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT> </P> </BODY> </HTML> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2ED9D.33699FA6--