RE: Is CDI dead?
"jayasurya venugopalan" <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Mar 2003 03:58:57 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.cdi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3DWindows-1252"> <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version = 6.0.6249.1"> <TITLE>RE: Is CDI dead?</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <!-- Converted from text/plain format --> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Hi,<BR> I feel if even only 2or 3 of us are interested we should carry = on.<BR> Some of us may not be in a postion to actively contribute but we could = well observe and comment.<BR> Rgds<BR> jayasurya<BR> <BR> -----Original Message-----<BR> From: Mark Day [<A = HREF=3D"mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]</A>]<BR> Sent: Wed 3/19/2003 3:01 AM<BR> To: [email protected]; [email protected]<BR> Cc: <BR> Subject: RE: Is CDI dead?<BR> <BR> We do still have a couple of drafts (scenarios and known-mechanisms) = that<BR> could conceivably make it to RFC. But other than that, I would say that = the<BR> group is pretty inert and that the people who responded to my last = query<BR> overwhelmingly said that the WG should be wound down.<BR> <BR> --Mark<BR> <BR> > -----Original Message-----<BR> > From: [email protected] [<A = HREF=3D"mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]</A>]= On Behalf Of<BR> > Michael Speer<BR> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:14 PM<BR> > To: [email protected]<BR> > Subject: Is CDI dead?<BR> ><BR> ><BR> > > All,<BR> > ><BR> > > Is CDI dead? No activity and no interest leads me to = believe the<BR> > > group is dead. Mark<BR> > > do you have any comments?<BR> > ><BR> > > Michael<BR> ><BR> ><BR> ><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> -----Original Message-----<BR> From: Mark Day [<A = HREF=3D"mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]</A>]<BR> Sent: Wed 3/19/2003 3:01 AM<BR> To: [email protected]; [email protected]<BR> Cc: <BR> Subject: RE: Is CDI dead?<BR> <BR> We do still have a couple of drafts (scenarios and known-mechanisms) = that<BR> could conceivably make it to RFC. But other than that, I would say that = the<BR> group is pretty inert and that the people who responded to my last = query<BR> overwhelmingly said that the WG should be wound down.<BR> <BR> --Mark<BR> <BR> > -----Original Message-----<BR> > From: [email protected] [<A = HREF=3D"mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]</A>]= On Behalf Of<BR> > Michael Speer<BR> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:14 PM<BR> > To: [email protected]<BR> > Subject: Is CDI dead?<BR> ><BR> ><BR> > > All,<BR> > ><BR> > > Is CDI dead? No activity and no interest leads me to = believe the<BR> > > group is dead. Mark<BR> > > do you have any comments?<BR> > ><BR> > > Michael<BR> ><BR> ><BR> ><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> </FONT> </P> </BODY> </HTML>