Re: Is CDI dead?

David Frascone <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Mar 2003 16:41:40 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.cdi
Message-ID <20030318224140.GC21654@wolverine>
I think that's the problem.  No one is observing or commenting on the
drafts that *have* been submitted.

-Dave

On Wednesday, 19 Mar 2003, jayasurya venugopalan wrote:
> 
>    Hi,
>     I feel if even only 2or 3 of us are interested we should carry on.
>    Some of us may not be in a postion to actively contribute but we could
>    well observe and comment.
>    Rgds
>    jayasurya
>    -----Original Message-----
>    From:   Mark Day [[1]mailto:[email protected]]
>    Sent:   Wed 3/19/2003 3:01 AM
>    To:     [email protected]; [email protected]
>    Cc:
>    Subject:        RE: Is CDI dead?
>    We do still have a couple of drafts (scenarios and known-mechanisms)
>    that
>    could conceivably make it to RFC. But other than that, I would say
>    that the
>    group is pretty inert and that the people who responded to my last
>    query
>    overwhelmingly said that the WG should be wound down.
>    --Mark
>    > -----Original Message-----
>    > From: [email protected] [[2]mailto:[email protected]]On
>    Behalf Of
>    > Michael Speer
>    > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:14 PM
>    > To: [email protected]
>    > Subject: Is CDI dead?
>    >
>    >
>    > > All,
>    > >
>    > > Is CDI dead?  No activity and no interest leads me to believe the
>    > > group is dead.  Mark
>    > > do you have any comments?
>    > >
>    > > Michael
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    -----Original Message-----
>    From:   Mark Day [[3]mailto:[email protected]]
>    Sent:   Wed 3/19/2003 3:01 AM
>    To:     [email protected]; [email protected]
>    Cc:
>    Subject:        RE: Is CDI dead?
>    We do still have a couple of drafts (scenarios and known-mechanisms)
>    that
>    could conceivably make it to RFC. But other than that, I would say
>    that the
>    group is pretty inert and that the people who responded to my last
>    query
>    overwhelmingly said that the WG should be wound down.
>    --Mark
>    > -----Original Message-----
>    > From: [email protected] [[4]mailto:[email protected]]On
>    Behalf Of
>    > Michael Speer
>    > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:14 PM
>    > To: [email protected]
>    > Subject: Is CDI dead?
>    >
>    >
>    > > All,
>    > >
>    > > Is CDI dead?  No activity and no interest leads me to believe the
>    > > group is dead.  Mark
>    > > do you have any comments?
>    > >
>    > > Michael
>    >
>    >
>    >
> 
> References
> 
>    1. mailto:[email protected]
>    2. mailto:[email protected]
>    3. mailto:[email protected]
>    4. mailto:[email protected]

-- 
David Frascone

            We're lost, but we're making good time.