RE: Not in Yokohama?

[ post by non-subscriber.  with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to
  miss and therefore delete mis-posts.  so fix subscription addresses! ]

I don't expect to be in Yokohama

Michael


> 
> I will be in Yokohama too.
> 
> Oliver
> 
> Martin May writes:
>  > Mark,
>  > 
>  > I also expect to be in Yokohama and I think we should have our meeting.
>  > However, it would be nice to know who plans to attend.
>  > 
>  > Martin
>  > 
>  > -> -----Original Message-----
>  > -> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf
> Of
>  > -> Mark Day
>  > -> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 04:32 PM
>  > -> To: [email protected]
>  > -> Subject: Not in Yokohama?
>  > ->
>  > ->
>  > -> Although we have made some useful progress in the group (forwarding the
>  > -> model, scenarios, and known-mechanisms drafts to the IESG) I
>  > -> have not seen
>  > -> much activity lately that would suggest that we should be meeting at
> the
>  > -> next IETF get-together.  In particular, the only new draft has been
> Dave
>  > -> Frascone's AAA work, which has drawn little comment.
>  > ->
>  > -> I have received informal indications from some people that they
>  > -> are unlikely
>  > -> to be able to attend even if we arrange a slot for a WG meeting.
>  > ->
>  > -> I expect to be in Japan anyway for other WGs, so I don't mind
>  > -> which way we
>  > -> decide.  But my current sense is that CDI will not be meeting in
>  > -> Yokohama.
>  > -> If you feel otherwise, this is your opportunity to convince me, Phil,
> and
>  > -> the rest of the group into shifting the rough consensus I currently
>  > -> perceive.
>  > ->
>  > -> --Mark
>  > ->
>  > ->
>  > ->
>  > ->
>  > 
>  > 
>  > 
>  > 
>  > 
>