Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification-08.txt
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
} If revealing other hosts addresses and } alllowing onlink peer-to-peer communication is undesirable for a } given network segment, then layer2 (link-layer) isolation shall be } used. I think you'll get a BCP14 query on "shall" here from the IESG. (And I hate putting BCP14 into Security Considerations, so upcasing that would not be my choice) Is there a document that already says this? Can we just write: } If revealing other hosts addresses and } alllowing onlink peer-to-peer communication is undesirable for a } given network segment, then the recommendations of [RFCXXXX] apply. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 515 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFKBAEBCgA0FiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmWoCrAWHG1jcitpZXRm QHNhbmRlbG1hbi5jYQAKCRCAi3D73dDdZe3sB/oDtqrnZtCbG3kZ7sVWjzB1z6/l bV7JMwL0UMr2qykygRdK9Ty38GVyl0VO7x0jqvl/D0f57CX7a4OMKC1Iyfw6NWDP qgsA6cMNdUs3+eM7ZZoeWKaAqaYMhfpaI4ZsisCHJNxNjXg5rt7gTdRVmkUg9IeX ehnyNJZNLLYP30ABoLE6Zq376D9npkl1noMcQHJhtSh1+NceNShoblnibq7Jtqxr GG5G3Trg0EnJuhD84ZBpUOZlCeeISdQ+82K6RhNWcOjxvw1reh+8KrZpzlkV2W4Y whx9EEwq54+KGY7J/nt1WuULClDSk99u4P/UfBWHDFrzrhLB6rA7QhiuAvII =QJhD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----