Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification-08.txt
Li HUANG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGGiuEbVO5=BJbaMFWWRYHuhooGqCxm7vf=_gPoNRfvbcbPEKg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024, 11:14 Li HUANG <[email protected]> wrote: > Host(s) add. most critical even from the top anti or, DB anywhere holders. > > Event view 63, 1000 ...alerts Microsoft *,see attaching x2 that over > limited* . > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024, 01:14 Michael Richardson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> } If revealing other hosts addresses and >> } alllowing onlink peer-to-peer communication is undesirable for >> a >> } given network segment, then layer2 (link-layer) isolation >> shall be >> } used. >> >> I think you'll get a BCP14 query on "shall" here from the IESG. >> (And I hate putting BCP14 into Security Considerations, so upcasing that >> would not be my choice) >> >> Is there a document that already says this? Can we just write: >> >> } If revealing other hosts addresses and >> } alllowing onlink peer-to-peer communication is undesirable for >> a >> } given network segment, then the recommendations of [RFCXXXX] >> apply. >> >> -- >> Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting >> ) >> Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dhcwg mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg >> > _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg