[dhcwg] Re: Jim Guichard's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc- addr-notification-11: (with COMMENT)

Hi Jen,

From: Jen Linkova <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 at 10:09 AM
To: James Guichard <[email protected]>
Cc: The IESG <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Jim Guichard's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification-11: (with COMMENT)

> 147        option in its Reply message.  If the network does not support (or is
> 148        not willing to receive) any address registration information, the
> 149        client MUST NOT register any addresses.  Otherwise, the client
> 150        registers addresses as described below.
>
> Jim> What happens if the client ignores the MUST NOT?

Well, the server will be receiving some packets it's not configured to process.
Do you want us to make it explicit that 'MUST NOT' is for preventing
some garbage traffic?
Jim> yes that would be clearer and thank you!
Jim

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]