[dhcwg] Re: Jim Guichard's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc- addr-notification-11: (with COMMENT)

Hi Jim,

On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 12:23 AM James Guichard
<[email protected]> wrote:
> > 147        option in its Reply message.  If the network does not support (or is
> > 148        not willing to receive) any address registration information, the
> > 149        client MUST NOT register any addresses.  Otherwise, the client
> > 150        registers addresses as described below.
> >
> > Jim> What happens if the client ignores the MUST NOT?
>
> Well, the server will be receiving some packets it's not configured to process.
> Do you want us to make it explicit that 'MUST NOT' is for preventing
> some garbage traffic?
>
> Jim> yes that would be clearer and thank you!

Ack, the changes have been submitted to Github, shall appear in -12,
which we are planning to submit tomorrow.

-- 
Cheers, Jen Linkova

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]