[dhcwg] Re: Erik Kline's Yes on draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notifi cation-12: (with COMMENT)
Jen Linkova <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFU7BAQM+PHN-ERLNd0WdE7ZUyf33FO9rQY=R0rZxTPPwRx6tw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Erik, On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 11:14 AM Erik Kline via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > ### S3 > > * "After successfully assigning...configured IPv6 address" -> > "After successfully assigning...configured valid IPv6 address" > > This would match the RFC 4862 "valid addresses" specificity used in S4.2. I think as per RFC4862, "invalid address - an address that is not assigned to any interface.", so I guess it's not possible to assign "invalid address". What do you think? > ## Nits > > ### S3 > > * "the client MUST NOT register any addresses" -> > "the client MUST NOT register any addresses using the mechanism in this > specification" Ack, will be fixed in -13. -- Cheers, Jen Linkova _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]