[dhcwg] Re: 8415bis
Timothy Winters <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:40:11 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJgLMKvJn7QObhNOnapKRDXat_zmY9f1_T3=eutxj41CLvyMOg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Guys, Sorry for the delay. I will get this by Monday at the latest, possibly this weekend. ~Tim On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 4:48 AM Bernie Volz <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Suresh! > > The document is ready for the write up. > > There are a few very minor issues that can be addressed in an 06 ( > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/UgWtdEVv_VhEHNc3z119kHcST4I/), > but best if you work on doing shepherd write up as you may find more and we > can include those in the 06 and then send the 06 on when published. > > - Bernie Volz > > On Sep 18, 2024, at 11:23 PM, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I am totally up for shepherding this Bernie. Let me know when I should > start the process. > > Thanks > Suresh > > On Sep 18, 2024, at 7:10 PM, Bernie Volz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Tim has volunteered to apply these fixes, otherwise the document really is > ready to go and shepherd review can occur now, so if any nits (or issues) > are found they can be addressed as part of the next version - which is > hopefully sent to AD/IESG. > > > So, I think the ball is really in Suresh’s court … unless he is no longer > willing to shepherd and we can search for another. The shepherd work for > this document is really to do the shepherd write up document … we will > continue to work on this should AD or IESG (last call) issues arrise, so > shepherd really isn’t critical for those phases. Though sadly we do move a > bit slower than many of us would like! > > > - Bernie (from iPad) > > > On Sep 18, 2024, at 6:37 PM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Bernie Volz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi … is it time to work on getting the 8415bis draft moving to > > publication (close WGLC as still open, do > > shepherd write-up, …)? It has been 2 weeks since IETF meeting. > > > I did have a few minor nits with the -05 … see > > > It seems like we just need to push some buttons. > > > Reviews shouldn't be significant, unless reviewers insist on re-opening > > things from 8415. Who can drive this, if Bernie, as an author, is > > reluctant. Is Suresh the shepherd? Yes. > > > state is: Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG > > > are there github issues that I've missed? > > > I'm open to a design team meeting to walk through the issues. > > > -- > > Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > > > <signature.asc> > > > _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]