[dhcwg] Re: Mohamed Boucadair's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc- rfc8415bis-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Apr 2025 11:08:51 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mohamed Boucadair via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks to Tim Chown for his outstanding OPSDIR review. I appreciate that the > authors already engaged to address the review. I hear the arguments made by the > authors for the proposal to cite some recent specs. I'm monitoring that > discussion and hope the right balance will be found given the intended IS > status. Well, we authors really need some guidance. We believe we should not cite any work that does not have clear and signficiant implementation experience. We have turned Tim Chown's review into github issues, we processed a dozen last night, and have 15 more go to. > The other is the inconsistency in what’s said in Sections 16 and 18. I’d > suggest someone (an author) goes through them both and checks in detail. One > way to simplify it would be to just remove section 16, much like the last > Appendix where there might (but I didn’t check) also be inconsistencies. But > that validation information being spelled out from the spec in Section 18 is > useful. We discussed this a lot last night. Section 16 is about easy ways/checks to discard invalid packets. Having done the checks in section 16, the packet might still be invalid according to more detailed considerations in section 18. We don't think that's inconsistent. Section 18 is about how to process all the different things. > # RFC8415 is not normative > Please move RFC8415 to be listed as Informative. That one will be obsoleted. Okay. I will turn the rest of your comments into issues today. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 515 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFKBAEBCgA0FiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmgLpYMWHG1jcitpZXRm QHNhbmRlbG1hbi5jYQAKCRCAi3D73dDdZfDXCACyQpoBscUHyE51rkNmsFy+djue 3GBG1NWkLA6o6104vOSbgv3V7Njp8SMfOdIvVFF3icefjVXgo9xsTzNwUiYkqovN Rj0g7VAmsZXsMu2IAv6hbvQnWLvdVblbjNo/VhOh9kbghvkyagADjdyz1GWbUode gPkPFdWa2wpKE5R2W9tblh0LjJsLWTlEMbQmSW4tL9VIivhw4ORP8x9l1+6TGAWs +nxIhYEU0SXCyNgqZImpx7cZjhKXNDgjGoOmMm0jMWZVfxuwBUFMXWvnGOPzeX1g HFH36k1Naspe9GcDuTZnAzpgX9IjFiB1xWgofBl8QYaNguVFu54j5gjfnxqu =vrW8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----