[dhcwg] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc84 15bis-09: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to Dale R. Worley for the GENART review.

** Section 25.
  IANA is requested to mark the IA_TA (option code 4) and UNICAST
   (option code 12) in the Option Codes table at
   <https://www.iana.org/assignments/dhcpv6-parameters> as obsolete.

   IANA is requested to mark the UseMulticast (status code 5) in the
   Status Codes table at <https://www.iana.org/assignments/
   dhcpv6-parameters> as obsolete.

How does one mark something as obsolete in a registry which does not have an explicit status column?



_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]