[dhcwg] Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc -rfc8415bis-09: (with COMMENT)

This has been added to issues tracker-https://github.com/dhcwg/rfc8415bis/issues/53

- Bernie Volz

> On Apr 30, 2025, at 3:36 PM, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis-09: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thank you to Dale R. Worley for the GENART review.
> 
> ** Section 25.
>  IANA is requested to mark the IA_TA (option code 4) and UNICAST
>   (option code 12) in the Option Codes table at
>   <https://www.iana.org/assignments/dhcpv6-parameters> as obsolete.
> 
>   IANA is requested to mark the UseMulticast (status code 5) in the
>   Status Codes table at <https://www.iana.org/assignments/
>   dhcpv6-parameters> as obsolete.
> 
> How does one mark something as obsolete in a registry which does not have an explicit status column?
> 
> 
>

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]