[dhcwg] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draft-ietf- dhc-rfc8415bis-09: (with COMMENT)

Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Thu, 08 May 2025 13:51:20 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dhc
Message-ID <1366002.1746708680@dyas>
Ketan Talaulikar via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote:
    > 274     1.1.  Relationship to Previous DHCPv6 Standards

    > 276        The initial specification of DHCPv6 was defined in [RFC3315], and a
    > 277        number of follow-up documents were published over the years:

    > <major> I see that this document is trying to carry forward history prior
    > to RFC8415 about DHCPv6 specifications. I find this concerning since it asks
    > the reader to go back to those old and obsoleted documents when reading
    > this

I think that point is to say that all those documents were incorporated in,
so you don't need to read them.  Also that text was in RFC8415, and we are
supposed to make minimal changes :-)
All the documents listed are informative.

One of us will turn your comments into github issues.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 658 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=8buN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----