[dhcwg] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draft-ietf- dhc-rfc8415bis-09: (with COMMENT)
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Thu, 08 May 2025 13:51:20 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1366002.1746708680@dyas> |
Ketan Talaulikar via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > 274 1.1. Relationship to Previous DHCPv6 Standards > 276 The initial specification of DHCPv6 was defined in [RFC3315], and a > 277 number of follow-up documents were published over the years: > <major> I see that this document is trying to carry forward history prior > to RFC8415 about DHCPv6 specifications. I find this concerning since it asks > the reader to go back to those old and obsoleted documents when reading > this I think that point is to say that all those documents were incorporated in, so you don't need to read them. Also that text was in RFC8415, and we are supposed to make minimal changes :-) All the documents listed are informative. One of us will turn your comments into github issues. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS* _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 658 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEEow/1qDVgAbWL2zxYcAKuwszYgEMFAmgcqMgACgkQcAKuwszY gEOaQAv+P0z7FJKpAeBiEBiAFtP21muEM5GukhZSRVZV5rtI1JAEBxfUto2Xjnq4 Y83+sxlKgugtDfCPfpxoJ5h64ShTpQWdVGKE/TP9At1wlLN7x8TE1mGv/n6mD3BZ P4UOuudFb79gtwML72VscllvoGutsrvofT44UVDTlRbvpVn2KxkKNN2dJ2kjtDz6 mUwupAwTFaRUebPC6R+6RpTTVYzxAXT6IflutPrifnrw7g8HqxHOMUNAWTb7Y0ou rYmBSK5CewBmZLPACdoa4QUufYXeOJTBGZby/j7j0xf7f4lx6Vwg4lkbeZIKNqbc p52+txfzuMtBBYQ6S8auhY4nSiBKEqRB+fBUI2CgR7n2vUfW2VBgo7Duf/oNeQtq WurnHfFJzw8tELyBVdWBsioEoLHNkEVS5X72wXqrUuW7/S51FGLr5En/LJRsMwnx r0yduXzVTnw8nOyzLel7xngrrOaWb+GzbLK8JdOoAQAmMQaeQ6+adGZKmpd+NuGY 9xpirRd+ =8buN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----