[dhcwg] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draft-ietf- dhc-rfc8415bis-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Michael,

Thanks for your response. Happy to work with you and co-authors on
addressing the comments.

Thanks,
Ketan


On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 6:21 PM Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Ketan Talaulikar via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote:
>     > 274     1.1.  Relationship to Previous DHCPv6 Standards
>
>     > 276        The initial specification of DHCPv6 was defined in
> [RFC3315], and a
>     > 277        number of follow-up documents were published over the
> years:
>
>     > <major> I see that this document is trying to carry forward history
> prior
>     > to RFC8415 about DHCPv6 specifications. I find this concerning since
> it asks
>     > the reader to go back to those old and obsoleted documents when
> reading
>     > this
>
> I think that point is to say that all those documents were incorporated in,
> so you don't need to read them.  Also that text was in RFC8415, and we are
> supposed to make minimal changes :-)
> All the documents listed are informative.
>
> One of us will turn your comments into github issues.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]