RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-09.txt

"Kumar, Rajesh" <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:06:35 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.disman
Message-ID <6CF1217966D48442AD2A788E8DE45E648EB801@vtg-um-e2k7.sj21ad.cisco.com>
Dear Juergen,
It does answer my question. You might want to add this clarifying text
in the document.

Thanks for the quick response.

Rajesh 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Quittek [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 8:03 AM
> To: Kumar, Rajesh; [email protected]; Randy Presuhn; Bert 
> Wijnen; David Kessens
> Cc: Jon Heaton; Jim Whitten; Azita Kia (akia); Biskner, 
> Robert; Mostafa, Mohamed; Liu , Jenny; Michael Hammer 
> (mhammer); Randy Ethier (rethier); Dinesh Goyal (digoyal); 
> Sachin Saswade; Wing, Dan; Lantz, Keith; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-09.txt 
> 
> Dear Rajesh,
> 
> Thanks for the comment.
> 
> --On 2/23/06 4:10 PM -0800 Kumar, Rajesh wrote:
> >
> > Kenneth and Juergen,
> >
> > Congratulatons on your internet draft on reporting ping/traceroute 
> > results being in last call.
> >
> > Basically, it is a good draft. I  do have one concern. When 
> you do a 
> > UDP or ICMP traceroute from any node, yoy typically get three delay 
> > approximations for each stimulus-response with increasing TTLs. 
> > Granted that this is an approximation, I did not see a 
> mechanism for 
> > reporting this inforation in your internet draft. Maybe I missed it 
> > and it is there?
> 
> It is indeed important to store and make available all these 
> measured values.
> 
> The DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB contains the information you are 
> looking for in the traceRouteProbeHistoryTable.
> 
> For clarifying terminology: In the draft a traceroute test 
> includes sending several probes with different hopCount (TTL) values.
> 
> Table traceRouteProbeHistoryTable contains one entry per probe.
> Entries are indexed (among other indices) by
>              traceRouteProbeHistoryHopIndex,
>              traceRouteProbeHistoryProbeIndex.
> 
> Now, if you configure the MIB module to perform three 
> traceroute probes per hop that deliver three delay 
> approximations, then this table will contain three entries 
> with the same value for traceRouteProbeHistoryHopIndex but 
> with different values for traceRouteProbeHistoryProbeIndex.  
> Each of these entries will contain one of the delay approximations.
> 
> Does this answers your question?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>     Juergen
> -- 
> Juergen Quittek        [email protected]       Tel: +49 
> 6221 90511-15
> NEC Europe Ltd.,       Network Laboratories        Fax: +49 
> 6221 90511-55
> Kurfuersten-Anlage 36, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany   
> http://www.netlab.nec.de
> 
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Rajesh Kumar
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 3:50 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-09.txt
> >>
> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> >> directories.
> >> This draft is a work item of the Distributed Management 
> Working Group 
> >> of the IETF.
> >>
> >> 	Title		: Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote
> >> Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations
> >> 	Author(s)	: J. Quittek, K. White
> >> 	Filename	: draft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-09.txt
> >> 	Pages		: 97
> >> 	Date		: 2006-2-22
> >> 	
> >> This memo defines Management Information Bases (MIBs) for 
> performing 
> >> ping, traceroute and lookup operations at a host.
> >> When managing a network it is useful to be able to initiate and 
> >> retrieve the results of ping or traceroute operations when 
> performed 
> >> at a remote host.  A Lookup capability is defined in order 
> to enable 
> >> resolution of either an IP address to an DNS name or a DNS 
> name to an 
> >> IP address at a remote host.
> >>
> >> Currently, there are several enterprise-specific MIBs for 
> performing 
> >> remote ping or traceroute operations.  The purpose of this 
> memo is to 
> >> define a standards-based solution to enable interoperability.
> >>
> >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-disman-remops-m
> >> ib-v2-09.t
> >> xt
> >>
> >> To remove yourself from the I-D Announcement list, send a 
> message to 
> >> [email protected] with the word unsubscribe in 
> the body 
> >> of the message.
> >> You can also visit 
> >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/I-D-announce
> >> to change your subscription settings.
> >>
> >>
> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login 
> with the 
> >> username "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After 
> >> logging in, type "cd internet-drafts" and then
> >> 	"get draft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-09.txt".
> >>
> >> A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in 
> >> http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or 
> >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> >>
> >>
> >> Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail.
> >>
> >> Send a message to:
> >> 	[email protected].
> >> In the body type:
> >> 	"FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-09.txt".
> >> 	
> >> NOTE:	The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in
> >> 	MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility.  To use this
> >> 	feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE"
> >> 	command.  To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or
> >> 	a MIME-compliant mail reader.  Different MIME-compliant 
> mail readers
> >> 	exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with
> >> 	"multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split
> >> 	up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on
> >> 	how to manipulate these messages.
> >> 		
> >> 		
> >> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader 
> >> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the 
> >> Internet-Draft.
> >>
>