Re: disman remops

Hi Randy,

This sounds like a very good solution.

    Juergen

--On 3/16/06 7:55 PM -0800 Randy Presuhn wrote:

> Hi -
>
>> From: "Juergen Quittek" <[email protected]>
>> To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>; "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
>> Cc: "Dan Romascanu (E-mail)" <[email protected]>; "Disman" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 5:54 PM
>> Subject: Re: disman remops
> ...
>> Wouldn't it be helpful to be more explicit, for example, by appending
>>
>>              The value of traceRouteHopsHopIndex is not necessarily
>>              identical with the number of the hop on the traced path.
>>
>> to the description?
> ...
>
> I have no problem with the idea of being more explicit.  So
> how about this:
>
> OLD:
>            "Specifies the hop index for a traceroute hop.  Values
>            for this object with respect to the same
>            traceRouteCtlOwnerIndex and traceRouteCtlTestName
>            MUST start at 1 and increase monotonically.
>
> NEW:
>            "Specifies the hop index for a traceroute hop.  Values
>            for this object with respect to the same
>            traceRouteCtlOwnerIndex and traceRouteCtlTestName
>            MUST start at 1, and be given increasing  values for
>            subsequent hops.  The value of traceRouteHopsHopIndex
>            is not necessarily the number of the hop on the traced path.
>
> Ok?
>
> Randy
>