Re: disman remops
"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:02:09 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.disman |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <002f01c649fd$ad055840$6401a8c0@oemcomputer> |
Hi - > From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]> > To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Juergen Quittek (E-mail)" <[email protected]>; "Dan Romascanu (E-mail)" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 4:45 AM > Subject: RE: disman remops > > Randy, > > it would be good if you can give me a definite answer on > the exact text before mid next-week, so I can clear the > document and get it in approved state. ... I've heard no objections, and JuergenQ seems ok with the word- smithed text to address Tom Petch's comment. So, let's go with: OLD: "Specifies the hop index for a traceroute hop. Values for this object with respect to the same traceRouteCtlOwnerIndex and traceRouteCtlTestName MUST start at 1 and increase monotonically. NEW: "Specifies the hop index for a traceroute hop. Values for this object with respect to the same traceRouteCtlOwnerIndex and traceRouteCtlTestName MUST start at 1, and be given increasing values for subsequent hops. The value of traceRouteHopsHopIndex is not necessarily the number of the hop on the traced path. Randy