Re: Re: disman remops

Yes, I like it too

Tom Petch


----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
To: "Disman" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Bert Wijnen" <[email protected]>; "Romascanu,Dan (Dan)"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 9:02 PM
Subject: [Disman] Re: disman remops


> Hi -
>
> > From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: "Juergen Quittek (E-mail)" <[email protected]>; "Dan Romascanu
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 4:45 AM
> > Subject: RE: disman remops
> >
> > Randy,
> >
> > it would be good if you can give me a definite answer on
> > the exact text before mid next-week, so I can clear the
> > document and get it in approved state.
> ...
>
> I've heard no objections, and JuergenQ seems ok with the word-
> smithed text to address Tom Petch's comment.  So, let's go with:
>
> OLD:
>            "Specifies the hop index for a traceroute hop.  Values
>            for this object with respect to the same
>            traceRouteCtlOwnerIndex and traceRouteCtlTestName
>            MUST start at 1 and increase monotonically.
>
> NEW:
>            "Specifies the hop index for a traceroute hop.  Values
>            for this object with respect to the same
>            traceRouteCtlOwnerIndex and traceRouteCtlTestName
>            MUST start at 1, and be given increasing  values for
>            subsequent hops.  The value of traceRouteHopsHopIndex
>            is not necessarily the number of the hop on the traced path.
>
> Randy
>
>