RE: disman remops

Added as RFC-Editor note

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Presuhn [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 14:02
> To: Disman
> Cc: Bert Wijnen; Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Subject: Re: disman remops
> 
> 
> Hi -
> 
> > From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: "Juergen Quittek (E-mail)" <[email protected]>; "Dan 
> Romascanu (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 4:45 AM
> > Subject: RE: disman remops
> >
> > Randy, 
> > 
> > it would be good if you can give me a definite answer on
> > the exact text before mid next-week, so I can clear the
> > document and get it in approved state.
> ...
> 
> I've heard no objections, and JuergenQ seems ok with the word-
> smithed text to address Tom Petch's comment.  So, let's go with:
> 
> OLD:
>            "Specifies the hop index for a traceroute hop.  Values
>            for this object with respect to the same
>            traceRouteCtlOwnerIndex and traceRouteCtlTestName
>            MUST start at 1 and increase monotonically.
> 
> NEW:
>            "Specifies the hop index for a traceroute hop.  Values
>            for this object with respect to the same
>            traceRouteCtlOwnerIndex and traceRouteCtlTestName
>            MUST start at 1, and be given increasing  values for
>            subsequent hops.  The value of traceRouteHopsHopIndex
>            is not necessarily the number of the hop on the 
> traced path.
> 
> Randy
>