Re: Log MIB Implementation Survey

HI,

The most important issue is how the results areto be  interpreted.
 From my experience at Riverstone and with talking with
Ram about the cisco implementation, my interpretation is
that the current log MIB is not a good solution for the
need that it addresses. It's sort of hard to get excited
about developing a replacement, given the low deployment
of SNMPv3, and the almost universal model of locating the
filtering and access control in element managers instead
of in managed devices.

At 05:45 PM 7/12/2004 -0700, Randy Presuhn wrote:
>Hi -
>
>> From: "Wes Hardaker" <[email protected]>
>> To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
>> Cc: "Disman (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 2:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Disman] Log MIB Implementation Survey
>...
>> Here is an extremely late...  oh you get the point: sorry.
>...
>
>Thanks!  Are there any others out there?
>
>Randy
Regards,
/david t. perkins