Re: Log MIB Implementation Survey

Hi -

> From: "David T. Perkins" <[email protected]>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>; "Disman (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 9:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [Disman] Log MIB Implementation Survey
...
> The most important issue is how the results areto be  interpreted.
>  From my experience at Riverstone and with talking with
> Ram about the cisco implementation, my interpretation is
> that the current log MIB is not a good solution for the
> need that it addresses. It's sort of hard to get excited
> about developing a replacement, given the low deployment
> of SNMPv3, and the almost universal model of locating the
> filtering and access control in element managers instead
> of in managed devices.
...

Several IETF meetings you and Ram said that you'd
write up the issues that concern you and possible
solutions. Any progress?  An off-list discussion
(especially one that I haven't seen) is of little help to
me as WG chair, or to the rest of the WG.

Randy