RE: Fw: IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC-MIB vs IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC

"Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> Wed, 3 Nov 2004 18:09:03 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.disman
Message-ID <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B401C11A7D@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
hi

As I responded privately he is correct. IANA needs to update their version.

Sharon

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Randy Presuhn
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 1:17 PM
To: Disman (E-mail)
Subject: [Disman] Fw: IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC-MIB vs IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC


Hi -

Mike Thatcher has given me permission to forward this message.

Randy
==================================================
From: Mike Thatcher
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 2:31 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
Subject: IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC-MIB vs IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC

Defined in rfc3877 is IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC-MIB. Located in
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaitualarmtc-mib is a rename of this to
IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC (i.e. the "-MIB" is missing) - I am assuming the name in
the RFC is correct and the one on the IANA web site is typo which should be
corrected

Mike Thatcher