RE: Fw: IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC-MIB vs IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC
"Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> Wed, 3 Nov 2004 18:09:03 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.disman |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B401C11A7D@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com> |
hi As I responded privately he is correct. IANA needs to update their version. Sharon -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Randy Presuhn Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 1:17 PM To: Disman (E-mail) Subject: [Disman] Fw: IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC-MIB vs IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC Hi - Mike Thatcher has given me permission to forward this message. Randy ================================================== From: Mike Thatcher Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 2:31 PM To: '[email protected]' Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Subject: IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC-MIB vs IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC Defined in rfc3877 is IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC-MIB. Located in http://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaitualarmtc-mib is a rename of this to IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC (i.e. the "-MIB" is missing) - I am assuming the name in the RFC is correct and the one on the IANA web site is typo which should be corrected Mike Thatcher