Re: Fw: IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC-MIB vs IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC

Hi Sharon -

Will you, as co-editor, inform IANA that they need to correct the error?

Randy
disman WG chair

> From: "Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]>
> To: "Disman (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 3:09 PM
> Subject: RE: [Disman] Fw: IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC-MIB vs IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC
>

> hi
>
> As I responded privately he is correct. IANA needs to update their version.
>
> Sharon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Randy Presuhn
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 1:17 PM
> To: Disman (E-mail)
> Subject: [Disman] Fw: IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC-MIB vs IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC
>
>
> Hi -
>
> Mike Thatcher has given me permission to forward this message.
>
> Randy
> ==================================================
> From: Mike Thatcher
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 2:31 PM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
> Subject: IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC-MIB vs IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC
>
> Defined in rfc3877 is IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC-MIB. Located in
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaitualarmtc-mib is a rename of this to
> IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC (i.e. the "-MIB" is missing) - I am assuming the name in
> the RFC is correct and the one on the IANA web site is typo which should be
> corrected
>
> Mike Thatcher
>
>
>
>
>
>
>