Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-wouters-edns-tcp-keepalive-00.txt (fwd)
Mark Andrews <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In message <[email protected]>, Paul Wouters w rites: > On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > A nameserver that does not attempt to read a second request on a > > TCP socket is *broken*. If you are the vendor of such a product > > fix it and issue a update notice. > > Do you still see value in the edns-tcp-keepalive and timeout value, > or do you think dns clients can already assume they can sent multiple > queries and keep the tcp connection open for a reasonably time as per > RFC 5966? It will either work (the server is conformant and not over loaded) or it won't (the server is over loaded or broken). Sending multiple queries over TCP is a optimisation. If there is more than one broken vendor then writing a RFC saying this is a common problem may be useful. > Is there any measurement data out there to see how well multiple queries > over TCP works? > > Paul -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext