Re: Naked domain resolution with DNSSEC
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:37:25 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 06:29:26PM +0000, Kumar Ashutosh wrote: > Hi Jim > I agree on CNAME behaviour. My concern here is what option does the customer have in case he needs contoso.com and www.contoso.com both to be redirected to say contoso.dnsprovider.com > You have to maintain the zones in parallel. There's no getting around this. DNAME, note, doesn't work because it doesn't redirect the name itself. Best, A -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext