Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-wouters-edns-tcp-chain-query-01.txt (fwd)

At Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:24:26 -0400 (EDT),
Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is the 01 version for edns-tcp-chain-query-01

I have a couple of minor comments:

- In section 9.1, item #10:
        [...]  If it is a DNSSEC validating
        resolver, it ensures that no unvalidated data or out of baliwick
        data is accepted into the cache without having proper DNSSEC
        validation.
  I'm afraid "out of ba(i)liwick" is a bit unclear in this context
  regarding bailiwick against what.

- very minor nit: I suggest using "DNS message(s)" instead of DNS
  packet(s) throughout the draft, because "message" seems to be the
  more appropriate technical term per RFC 1035, and because "packet"
  can be ambiguous and in the general sense would normally be
  interpreted as individual IP packets.  I don't think such possible
  confusion is critical for the discussion of this draft, but if we
  can avoid it by simply replacing a word with another one, it should
  be worthwhile.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext