Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4191)
manning bill <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:28:29 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
concur with Donald & Sam. /bill PO Box 12317 Marina del Rey, CA 90295 310.322.8102 On 2December2014Tuesday, at 13:11, Samuel Weiler <[email protected]> wrote: > The errata is correct, but I agree with Donald - the old text is adequate and unlikely to lead to confusion. (Well ... plenty of people are confused about this particular piece of the spec, but this clarification is unlikely to change that. I am probably also biased, as the writer of that old text.) > > I have no objection to marking this as verified, but I do not see it as necessary. > > -- Sam > > _______________________________________________ > dnsext mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext