Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4191)
"Blacka, David" <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:53:56 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Agreed. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 2, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Samuel Weiler <[email protected]> wrote: > > The errata is correct, but I agree with Donald - the old text is adequate and unlikely to lead to confusion. (Well ... plenty of people are confused about this particular piece of the spec, but this clarification is unlikely to change that. I am probably also biased, as the writer of that old text.) > > I have no objection to marking this as verified, but I do not see it as necessary. > > -- Sam _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext