[DNSOP] Re: [art] Re: DNS-designated Public Key Author ities (DKA)

S Kishore <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dnsop
Message-ID <BL1PR11MB526959EA3E75CD96E18E3B5DC6EE2@BL1PR11MB5269.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Moonesamy >

The text in line 463 to 493 (Section 4) in
draft-swaminathan-dka-framework-02 looks like they were generated by
a Large Language Model.

Can you tell me, on what basis, do you make this claim?  As the writer, I know this is not true.

..Kishore


From: S Moonesamy <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, June 22, 2026 at 11:46 AM
To: Ben Schwartz <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: S Kishore <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Re: [art] Re: DNS-designated Public Key Author ities (DKA)

Hi Ben,

[Cc to DNSOP WG Chairs]

At 09:01 AM 22-06-2026, Ben Schwartz wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 21, 2026 at 7:09 PM S Kishore <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Regarding the LLM: I did not know there was a policy saying that
> AI-assisted messages should say so.
>
>To be clear, those recommendations are only my own, not the IETF's.

The text in line 463 to 493 (Section 4) in
draft-swaminathan-dka-framework-02 looks like they were generated by
a Large Language Model.

Internet-Drafts posted to the IETF Stream are expected to be
submitted in compliance with RFC 5378 (BCP 78), specifically Section
5.6.  In case it is not clear, the decision rests with the working group Chair.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.