[DNSOP] Re: Thoughts on handling large RRset sizes with PQC and other datasets

Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Jul 2026 11:27:15 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.dnsop
Message-ID	<CAOdQrVN5UeMWAJ0gMR_3MNU7evTRj=QRHEfb_ug--w7VzFAuBw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 8:40 PM Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > * The response can say "yes, but here are the new TTLs".
>
> So, the TTL value is unlikely to change right?

If you try to use this protocol between stub and resolver, they'll
change almost every time.  That's why I started thinking about how to
encode them separately.

I agree, this capability isn't relevant for resolver-auth communication.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]