RE: entity mib support for tcif

Or..., the DESCRIPTION clause could say that all zeroes for
the DateAndTime would mean 
"manufacture date unknown or nor supported"

Just thinking aloud here.

By the way, I believe that most of us are on entmib or atommib 
lists, so I have trimmed all the people names (except whom I responded to).
I have bcc:-ed you all this time, so you can spoeak up if my
assumtion is incorrect.

But even 2 mailing lists... can we move this to one list for now?

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: zondag 7 september 2003 11:06
> To: Kaj Tesink; [email protected]
> Cc: C. M. Heard; Giamboi, Anthony; Lam, Hing-Kam (Kam); Wijnen, Bert
> (Bert); [email protected]; Faye Ly
> Subject: RE: [Entmib] entity mib support for tcif
> 
> 
> 
> If this proposal is adopted, it looks like we need a 
> DateAndTimeOrNul TC, for these systems that do not support 
> manufacture date for some reason. 
> 
> Dan
> 
> > 
> > entPhysicalMfgDate   OBJECT-TYPE
> >       SYNTAX      DateAndTime
> >       MAX-ACCESS  read-only
> >       STATUS      current
> >       DESCRIPTION
> >               "The manufacturing date for the physical entity."
> >       ::= { entPhysicalEntry xx }
>