FW: [psg.com #312] AutoReply: Locked Admin State
"Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:38:52 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.entmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-312. The issue will be considered closed with no changes made to the document. I had proposed that logical locks were more useful and supportable from a software perspective than physical ones. There was no response. I propose keeping the definition as is. Sharon -----Original Message----- From: entity-state [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:03 AM To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH] Subject: [psg.com #312] AutoReply: Locked Admin State <clip> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keith McCloghrie [[email protected]] "> the entities to which this MIB applies are physical entities, and thus > it seems natural to apply the term 'locked' in a physcial sense, rather > than a logical sense, i.e., 'locked' is not the right term to use for > administratively disabling a device, because if a device had a physical > lock, then its adminState should not be 'locked' if/when its physical lock > could be unlocked, and vice versa."